separate-boundary-awareness-boundary-compliance-probes TEC-0204 · proposedSeparate boundary-awareness from boundary-compliance probes
Ask the same role-played model a binary question about whether a target is inside the character's knowledge boundary, then separately ask a concrete factual multiple-choice question with an abstention option, and pair the two outcomes per i
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Ask the same role-played model a binary question about whether a target is inside the character's knowledge boundary, then separately ask a concrete factual multiple-choice question with an abstention option, and pair the two outcomes per i Filed by the drafting stage from CHARM: Character Hallucination for Multicultural Role Play Benchmark (2609.01352) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Applied to 680 awareness and 1,332 compliance items across six models; compliance-gap rate exceeded recognition-failure rate for every model (e.g. GPT-4o 91.3% awareness accuracy, 18.9% compliance accuracy, 72.1% gap vs 8.9% recognition failure), and a knowledge-verification probe confirmed 78-100% of factually correct gap cases in five of six models as parametric overrides.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.