process · shared-semantic-blueprint-parallel-restructuring-branches-repair-execution TEC-0324 · proposed

Shared semantic blueprint, parallel restructuring branches,

One agent reconstructs the source program's states, operators and dependencies into a structured representation and a target-side blueprint; several agents then generate alternative tensor realizations under that blueprint, failures are rep

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

One agent reconstructs the source program's states, operators and dependencies into a structured representation and a target-side blueprint; several agents then generate alternative tensor realizations under that blueprint, failures are rep Filed by the drafting stage from Semantics-Guided Automatic Tensorization for Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Multi-Agent Framework (2609.02387) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Convergence pass rate over 240 attempts per condition against one-shot translation with the same backend: 78.75% vs 26.67% (Gemini 3 Flash), 65.42% vs 27.08% (DeepSeek V4 Pro), 59.58% vs 16.67% (DeepSeek V4 Flash); coverage 48/48 MOEAs with at least one converged implementation vs 45/48 for the best one-shot condition; downstream fidelity 88.2% of 1,904 MOEA-problem comparisons passing the IGD tolerance criterion.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Getting more from several models than from one

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.