switch-dense-sparse-agent-topology-disagreement-falls TEC-0331 · proposedSwitch from dense to sparse agent topology as disagreement f
The harness selects all-to-all inter-agent communication while aggregate disagreement exceeds a threshold and a ring topology once it falls below, with a token budget decremented each round and a guard that halts on exhaustion.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
The harness selects all-to-all inter-agent communication while aggregate disagreement exceeds a threshold and a ring topology once it falls below, with a token budget decremented each round and a guard that halts on exhaustion. Filed by the drafting stage from A Control-Theoretic Approach for Resource-Aware Consensus in Multi-Agent AI (2608.25099) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Rounds-to-consensus and total input tokens for adaptive vs complete-only vs ring-only, on one planning task with three LLM backbones; adaptive used 41,727 tokens / 9 rounds for GPT vs 67,593 / 12 complete-only and 60,858 / 17 ring-only; Claude under complete-only exhausted the 100,000-token budget. No repeated trials or statistical test.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.