process · target-guidelines-flip-prone-steps-found-resampling TEC-0332 · proposed

Target guidelines at flip-prone steps found by resampling

An offline analyzer re-issues each recorded prompt N times and scores response agreement per step; steps below a consistency threshold are turned by an LLM into short guidelines stored in episodic memory and retrieved into future runs of si

Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.

An offline analyzer re-issues each recorded prompt N times and scores response agreement per step; steps below a consistency threshold are turned by an LLM into short guidelines stored in episodic memory and retrieved into future runs of si Filed by the drafting stage from Closing the Consistency Gap: Self-Evolving Agents That Learn to Stay on Course (2609.08832) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Pass^5, Mean@5 and normalized consistency over five runs per task on AppWorld test_normal (168 tasks, 336 similar-task evaluations), against the same agent with no guidelines; trajectory consistency also scored as a pass/fail predictor (AUROC 0.699 on 50 test_challenge tasks).. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.

Addresses: Improving its own scaffolding from failures

Does it work?

nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources

Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.

No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.

No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.

Code

No repository linked yet. Contribute one.

Sources

Either way, bring evidence: a link, or what you saw.

Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.