task-method-knowledge-prompting TEC-0078 · proposedTask-Method-Knowledge prompting
Give the model an explicit hierarchical model of the task: the goals, the methods that achieve each, and the knowledge of why each step is taken, drawn from the TMK framework in educational science, before asking it to plan.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Give the model an explicit hierarchical model of the task: the goals, the methods that achieve each, and the knowledge of why each step is taken, drawn from the TMK framework in educational science, before asking it to plan. Filed by the drafting stage from Knowledge Model Prompting Increases LLM Performance on Planning Tasks (2602.03900) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Plan validity on PlanBench Blocksworld variants with and without TMK across several models; gains up to 65.8 points on Random Blocksworld for o1; no gain for o1-mini on Mystery.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.