train-evidence-absent-verification-through-matched-easier-task TEC-0333 · proposedTrain evidence-absent verification through matched easier ta
Rewrite each annotated paper error into a chain of three queries — error asserted with evidence given, candidate evidence only, and neither — and train on all three stages jointly rather than only on the hardest one.
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Rewrite each annotated paper error into a chain of three queries — error asserted with evidence given, candidate evidence only, and neither — and train on all three stages jointly rather than only on the hardest one. Filed by the drafting stage from Not Just Reason, Not Just Scan: Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Scientific Error Verification over Academic Paper (2608.26596) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Compared against Pure Scan training (Scan samples only) at matched Scan exposure (step 10) and at longer training (step 20), and against a curriculum that switches to Scan-only after 15 steps; the staged setting scored higher on Scan composite reward (19.5 vs 16.8/16.9/16.5) and on completeness, alignment and precision components. All metrics come from the paper's own reward definitions, scored by Seed-1.6-Thinking as a fixed extractor.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.