train-planner-executor-separate-role-adapters TEC-0219 · proposedTrain planner and executor as separate role adapters
Fit one LoRA adapter by sequence-level SFT on reference tool sequences for workflow planning and a second by node-level GRPO with argument-match rewards for runtime argument grounding, so workflow errors and argument errors get separate cre
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
Fit one LoRA adapter by sequence-level SFT on reference tool sequences for workflow planning and a second by node-level GRPO with argument-match rewards for runtime argument grounding, so workflow errors and argument errors get separate cre Filed by the drafting stage from Earth-Agent-Pro: Towards Real-World Full-Chain Earth Observation with Agents (2609.12533) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: On Earth-Bench-Pro, the 2x2 adapter composition: base/base 38.31% LLM-as-Judge, planner-tuned only 44.76%, executor-tuned only 43.15%, both 50.00%; planning-only evaluation raised TIO from 71.87 to 83.35, and oracle-plan executor evaluation raised judge accuracy from 46.37 to 52.82 and parameter accuracy from 34.19 to 37.20.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.