arxiv-2608-18423 SRC-0421 · paperFM-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Management with Competing Agents
Tianyou Wang, Chongyang Gao, Kezhen Chen, Chen Dong, Y. He, Donghan Li
Created: 2026-08-19 · Ingested: 2026-10-17
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18423(opens in a new tab)Language model agents now execute bounded tasks reliably. Whether they can sustain effective decision-making over long horizons, where actions have cumulative consequences and the environment responds to their choices, remains largely unmeasured. FM-Bench (Football Management Benchmark) measures this. An LLM agent runs a football club for 20 in-game years through 26 tools and roughly 340 to 400 decision stops. It drafts a squad on the same budget as every rival, trades players, negotiates contracts, invests in facilities and youth, sets lineups, and answers to a board that can fire it, while a
Referenced by
Claims in this catalog that draw on this source, and whether as support or counterpoint.
- supportsIn a 20-year deterministic football-management simulation with hidden state, adaptive rivals and 340-400 decision stops, final score across 15 frontier models is not ordered by model scale, price, vendor or token spend, and early standings barely predict the final order (rank correlation with the final order about 0.19 at year 5, rising to 0.78 by year 15), so short-horizon measurements would rank a different set of models.
- supportsIn a 20-year deterministic football-management simulation with hidden state and roughly 340-400 decision stops, what separates frontier models' final scores is managerial behavior rather than deliberation volume: cutting slow-payoff investment as the horizon ends (Spearman -0.58 with late-minus-mid investment shift), keeping cash deployed rather than idle (-0.50), and opening contract renewals early (+0.45) track the score on every seed, while token spend is uncorrelated under every accounting (r_s -0.19, all p > 0.38).