flag-deception-argument-schemes-plus-critical-questions TEC-0124 · proposedFlag deception with argument schemes plus critical questions
For a chosen deception argument scheme, an LLM instantiates each premise against the document with verbatim excerpts and a green/yellow/red judgement, then answers the scheme's critical questions with paired argument and counterargument bef
Proposed. Filed by the drafting stage because a paper introduces or tests it. Nobody has vouched for it. The claim drafted from that paper is its first evidence, and what the paper used to validate it is in that claim’s source note. Say whether it held up for you, below.
For a chosen deception argument scheme, an LLM instantiates each premise against the document with verbatim excerpts and a green/yellow/red judgement, then answers the scheme's critical questions with paired argument and counterargument bef Filed by the drafting stage from DeceptionAnalyser: A Web-Based AI Tool for Performing Structured Deception Analysis with Argumentation Schemes and LLMs (2609.24369) with status proposed: the paper introduces or tests it, and the claim drafted from the paper is its first evidence. The paper validated it by: Not measured against ground truth; validated only by consistency of premise and conclusion assessments across ten LLMs and repeated runs, plus an illustrative case analysis.. Nobody has vouched for it; add support or contest it on this page.
Does it work?
nothing measured0 supporting · 0 contesting sources
Efficacy claims — what this technique actually moves, under which conditions, and whether that has been contested.
No efficacy claim filed yet. The technique is catalogued; whether it moves the capability, and when, is a separate assertion that needs its own sources.
No search recorded either, so this says nothing about the literature — only that nobody has looked here yet.
Code
No repository linked yet. Contribute one.
Sources
Whether a technique works is a claim. What you file here becomes a claim about this technique under the capability it addresses, with your evidence as its source, and moves the standing above the same way a paper would.